WEGENBOUW
 
Lectured in 2nd year Master in Industrial Sciences in Construction Science
Theory [A] 24.0
Exercises [B] 36.0
Training and projects [C] 0.0
Studytime [D] 170
Studypoints [E] 6
Level introductory
Language of instruction Dutch
Lecturer Rudi DE VIERMAN
Reference IBIWBO02A00010
 
Key words
road construction, ground plan, linear profile, cross profile, traverse profile, foundation, hardening, asphalt concrete, very open asphalt, bridge

Objectives
The student knows how to design a road, according to locale circumstances and specific normative guidelines.
The student can appoint the components of bridges and can explain their function.

Topics
partim 1: Introduction to the road-, water- & bridge construction (B2BO231)
Geometrical deisgn of the road.
Structural consistency of roads.
Construction of road works.
Hydraulic constructions, different types of Bridges.

partim 2: Design 1 (B2BO232)
Several assignments.

Prerequisites
The student has knowlegde of geometry and normal solving techniques.
The student can use CAD software.
The student can search independently for information and knows how the select the essential and qualitative documents.

Final Objectives
The student knows how to design a road, according to locale circumstances and specific normative guidelines.
The student can design the plans of somple bridges.
The student knows how to justify his choises of the used materials and their application in a certain project.


Materials used
Syllabus Road Construction: ing. R. DE VIERMAN
Normative guidelines (SB250)
OCW announcements, design guidelines

Study costs
Syllabus Road Construction (ing. R. DE VIERMAN): 10 EUR
Student licence CAD: 50 EUR
Printing plans: 80 EUR

Study guidance
The students can ask questions during the theory sessions and the lab sessions. They can also email questions to the coaches at all times.

Teaching Methods
Formal lecture and lab exercise.

Assessment
Theory (oral/written examination): 60%
Lab exercise (individual work): 40%
However, if a student gains a score of 7 or less on 20 on one of the different courses (parts of training items), he proves that his skill for certain subcompetencies is insufficient. Consequently, one can turn from the arithmetical calculation of the final assignment of quotas of a training item and the new marks can be awarded on consensus. Of course the examiners can judge that the arithmetic regulations mentioned in the study index card can also be used for 7 or less. For each deviation a detailed motivation ought to be drawn up. In that case one should point out that the skill for this subcompetency is proven to be insufficient, if the student didn’t pass the partim that is considered to be important for certain subcompetencies.

Lecturer(s)
Rudi De Vierman, Marc Wylaers, André De Brabandere, Jeroen De Corte