RUIMTELIJK ONTWERPEN
 
Taught in Master in stedenbouw
Theory [A] 0.0
Exercises [B] 36.0
Training and projects [C] 0.0
Studytime [D] 85.0
Studypoints [E] 3
Level specialized
Credit contract? Unrestricted access
Examination contract?
Language of instruction Dutch
Lecturer Caroline NEWTON
Reference IMSTED01A00012
 
Key words
Design, spatial analyses, presentation

Objectives
- Getting to know alternative ways of urban design.
- Getting familiar with the urban design proces.
- Analysing a case, starting from a limited set of problems and themes. Subsequently followed by a design for a spatial concept.
- Being able to validate choices using literature and theory.
- Being concerned with the aesthetics of a presentation = graphical communication.
- Training presentation skills.

Topics
- Getting to know alternative ways of urban design.
- Analysing a case, starting from a limited set of problems and themes. Subsequently followed by a design for a spatial concept. Presenting this in groups.
- Brainstorm about small scale spatial “problems”.

Prerequisites


Final Objectives
- Being able to understand spatial themes through accurate analyses.
- Being able to work in team, give a presentation.
- Think critical.
- Being able to draw up qualitative spatial concepts.
- Be familiar with urban design proces.

Materials used
::Click here for additional information::


Study costs
Material for presentations and/or models.

Study guidance
During the sessions, or extra info through mail or Dokeos.

Teaching Methods
Teamwork, design sessions.

Assessment
Evaluation is twofold:
Primarily the presentation of the design work.
Secondly, an evaluation of all the work done throughout the year.

A weighted average is used to compute the final score for a training item. However, if a student gains a score of 7 or less on 20 on one of the different courses (parts of training items) , he proves that his skill for certain subcompetencies is insufficient. Consequently, one can turn from the arithmetical calculation of the final assignment of quotas of a training item and the new marks can be awarded on consensus.
Of course, the examiners can judge that the arithmetic regulations mentioned in the study index card can also be used for 7 or less.
For each deviation a detailed motivation ought to be drawn up. In that case one should point out that the skill for this subcompetency is proven to be insufficient, if the student didn't pass the partim that is considered to be important for certain subcompetencies.

Lecturer(s)